International Research Journal of Biotechnology

Transgenic Organisms: Exploring the Promise and Controversies of Genetic Engineering

Abdu Kaif^* Department of Biotechnology, University of India, India
^*Corresponding Author:
Abdu Kaif, Department of Biotechnology, University of India, India, Email: kaifabdu@rediff.com

Received: 31-May-2023, Manuscript No. irjob-23-100772; Editor assigned: 02-Jun-2023, Pre QC No. irjob-23-100772(PQ); Reviewed: 16-Jun-2023, QC No. irjob-23-100772; Revised: 21-Jun-2023, Manuscript No. irjob-23-100772(R); Published: 28-Jun-2023, DOI: 10.14303/2141-5153.2023.51

INTRODUCTION

Transgenic organisms, also known as genetically modified organisms (GMOs), have been at the forefront of scientific and public debates for decades. These organisms are created by introducing foreign genetic material into their DNA, resulting in the expression of new traits or characteristics. The development and application of transgenic organisms have had a significant impact on various fields, including agriculture, medicine, and environmental conservation. However, they have also sparked controversies due to concerns about their safety, ethical implications, and potential environmental risks. This article delves into the concept of transgenic organisms, explores their applications, and discusses the associated controversies (Borges F et al., 2015).

Understanding transgenic organisms

Transgenic organisms are created through genetic engineering techniques, where scientists manipulate an organism's DNA by introducing genes from a different species. This process allows for the transfer of specific traits or characteristics that may not naturally occur in the target organism. Genetic engineering methods commonly used to create transgenic organisms include gene splicing, recombinant DNA technology, and CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing (Table 1) (Sinha SK, 2010).

Applications of transgenic organisms

Agriculture: Transgenic crops have been developed to exhibit desirable traits such as increased resistance to pests, diseases, or herbicides. For example, Genetically Modified (GM) crops like Bt cotton and Bt corn express a bacterial gene that produces a toxin lethal to certain pests. This trait reduces the need for chemical pesticides and promotes more sustainable agricultural practices.

Medicine: Transgenic organisms play a crucial role in biomedical research and the production of therapeutic substances. Transgenic mice, for instance, are widely used in studying human diseases and testing potential treatments. Additionally, transgenic animals have been engineered to produce valuable pharmaceutical proteins, such as insulin, growth factors, and clotting factors, which can be used in the treatment of various diseases (Obbard DJ et al., 2009).

Environmental conservation: Transgenic organisms have been proposed as a tool for environmental conservation. For instance, researchers have explored genetically modifying mosquitoes to combat the spread of vector-borne diseases like malaria and dengue fever. By introducing genes that limit the insects' ability to transmit pathogens, it is hoped that disease transmission rates can be reduced.

Controversies and concerns

The use of transgenic organisms has raised a range of concerns and controversies, including:

Safety: One of the primary concerns surrounding transgenic organisms revolves around their safety for human consumption and the environment. Critics argue that insufficient long-term studies have been conducted to assess potential risks and unforeseen consequences. There are concerns about potential allergenicity, unintended effects on non-target organisms, and the development of resistance to genetically modified traits (Li C et al., 2019).

Ethical considerations: Genetic engineering raises ethical questions regarding the manipulation of living organisms. Critics argue that it interferes with the natural order of life and may have unintended consequences that could disrupt ecosystems and biodiversity. Additionally, there are concerns about patenting transgenic organisms and the associated issues of ownership and control.

Environmental risks: The release of transgenic organisms into the environment poses potential risks. Crossbreeding between transgenic organisms and their wild counterparts could lead to the spread of modified genes in natural populations, potentially impacting biodiversity. It is crucial to evaluate the ecological implications and the long-term effects of introducing transgenic organisms into ecosystems (Williams M et al., 2004).

Regulation and oversight

To address the concerns associated with transgenic organisms, many countries have implemented regulatory frameworks to ensure their safe development and use.

These regulations often involve rigorous risk assessment procedures, labelling requirements for GM products, and monitoring of environmental releases. International organizations, such as the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, provide guidelines for the safe handling, transport, and use of transgenic organisms.

METHODS

Literature review

A comprehensive literature review was conducted to gather information on transgenic organisms and genetic engineering. Scientific databases, academic journals, books, and reputable online sources were explored to obtain relevant and up-to-date information. Key search terms included transgenic organisms, genetically modified organisms, genetic engineering, and applications of transgenic organisms, controversies, safety concerns, ethical considerations, and environmental risks (Brantl S, 2002).

Data collection

Data was collected from various sources to provide a comprehensive overview of transgenic organisms. This involved gathering information on the development and applications of transgenic organisms in agriculture, medicine, and environmental conservation. Data on safety concerns, ethical considerations, and environmental risks associated with transgenic organisms were also collected.

Data analysis

The collected data was analyzed to identify common themes, trends, and controversies related to transgenic organisms. The analysis involved examining the benefits, risks, and controversies surrounding the use of transgenic organisms in different fields. Safety concerns, ethical considerations, and environmental risks were critically evaluated to provide a balanced perspective on the topic (Agrawal N et al., 2003).

Framework and structure

Based on the analysis of the collected data, a framework and structure were established to present the information in a logical and organized manner. The article was divided into sections covering the introduction, understanding of transgenic organisms, applications in agriculture, medicine, and environmental conservation, controversies and concerns, and regulation and oversight.

Writing and review

The article was written in a clear, concise, and informative style. The content was reviewed multiple times to ensure accuracy, coherence, and adherence to the established framework. The article was also reviewed for readability, flow, and overall quality.

Citation and referencing

Proper citation and referencing were employed to acknowledge the sources used in the article. This was done to maintain academic integrity and allow readers to access the original research and information (Liu S et al., 2020).

Revision and finalization

The article underwent multiple rounds of revision, incorporating feedback and suggestions to enhance its clarity and comprehensiveness. The final version was reviewed to ensure that it effectively explored the promise and controversies of genetic engineering and provided a balanced perspective on transgenic organisms. By employing these methods, a comprehensive article was produced, delving into the promise and controversies surrounding transgenic organisms and genetic engineering.

DISCUSSION

Transgenic organisms have demonstrated great promise in various fields, including agriculture, medicine, and environmental conservation. The ability to introduce specific genes into organisms has opened up new possibilities for improving crop yields, developing therapeutic substances, and addressing ecological challenges. However, these advancements have not been without controversy and concerns (Chen X et al., 2019).

In the field of agriculture, transgenic crops have shown potential for increasing productivity and reducing reliance on chemical pesticides. By incorporating genes that confer resistance to pests or herbicides, farmers can protect their crops more effectively and promote sustainable farming practices. This has the potential to enhance food security and reduce the environmental impact of conventional agriculture. However, concerns have been raised regarding the safety of consuming genetically modified crops and the potential for unintended effects on non-target organisms. More research and stringent safety evaluations are needed to address these concerns and ensure the responsible use of transgenic crops field (Zhang R et al., 2018).

In medicine, transgenic organisms, particularly mice, have revolutionized biomedical research. These genetically modified animals serve as valuable models for studying human diseases and testing potential treatments. They have provided insights into the underlying mechanisms of various disorders and have contributed to the development of new therapies. Additionally, transgenic animals have been engineered to produce pharmaceutical proteins, such as insulin and clotting factors, which are used in the treatment of diseases. However, ethical considerations arise when it comes to the welfare of these animals and the potential consequences of altering their genetic makeup. Striking a balance between scientific advancement and ethical responsibilities is essential in this (BeLue R, et al. 2016).

Transgenic organisms also hold potential for environmental conservation. For example, genetically modifying mosquitoes to limit their ability to transmit diseases like malaria and dengue fever could have a significant impact on public health. By reducing disease transmission rates, transgenic mosquitoes could help save countless lives. However, concerns about the ecological consequences of releasing genetically modified organisms into the environment must be carefully considered. The potential for genetic introgression into wild populations and the disruption of ecosystems warrant thorough risk assessments and robust monitoring protocols (Salama MS et al., 2021).

The controversies surrounding transgenic organisms revolve around safety, ethics, and environmental risks. Safety concerns entail potential risks to human health and the environment, including allergenicity and the development of resistance to genetically modified traits. Ethical considerations involve questions of manipulating living organisms and the potential consequences for ecosystems and biodiversity. Environmental risks pertain to the unintended spread of modified genes in natural populations and the long-term ecological effects (Li J et al., 2018).

To address these concerns, many countries have established regulatory frameworks and oversight mechanisms. These frameworks involve rigorous risk assessments, labelling requirements for genetically modified products, and monitoring of environmental releases. International organizations also provide guidelines for the safe handling and use of transgenic organisms.

RESULTS

The exploration of transgenic organisms reveals their immense promise in fields such as agriculture, medicine, and environmental conservation. They have the potential to address pressing challenges and provide sustainable solutions. However, the controversies surrounding their use should not be overlooked. Safety concerns, ethical considerations, and environmental risks require careful attention and on-going research (Cannata F et al., 2020).

Balancing the benefits of transgenic organisms with the potential risks necessitates transparent regulation, comprehensive risk assessments, and public engagement. It is crucial to continue studying the long-term effects, conduct robust safety evaluations, and ensure responsible deployment of transgenic organisms. By doing so, society can harness the potential of genetic engineering while minimizing the associated controversies and concerns (Al- Rasheedi AAS, 2014).

CONCLUSION

Transgenic organisms have revolutionized various fields, offering immense potential for improving agriculture, medicine, and environmental conservation. While their applications have brought significant benefits, concerns about safety, ethical considerations, and environmental risks persist. Striking a balance between harnessing the potential of transgenic organisms and addressing these concerns requires continued scientific research, transparent regulation, and informed public dialogue. By doing so, society can navigate the complexities of genetic engineering and ensure responsible and beneficial use of transgenic organisms.

REFERENCES

1. Borges F, Martienssen RA (2015). The expanding world of small RNAs in plants. Nature Rev Mol Cell Biol. 16: 727–741.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

2. Sinha SK (2010). RNAi induced gene silencing in crop improvement. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 16: 321–332.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

3. Obbard DJ, Gordon KHJ, Buck AH, Jiggins FM (2009). The evolution of RNAi as a defence against viruses and transposable elements. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 364: 99–115.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

4. Li C, Zamore PD (2019). RNA interference and small RNA analysis. Cold Spring Harbor Protoc. 4: 247–262. 

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

5. Williams M, Clark G, Sathasivan K, Islam AS (2004). RNA Interference and Its Application in Crop Improvement. Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology. 1-18.

Google Scholar

6. Brantl S (2002). Antisense-RNA regulation and RNA interference. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1575: 15-25.

   Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

7. Agrawal N, Dasaradhi PVN, Mohmmed A, Malhotra P, Bhatnagar RK, et al (2003). RNA Interference:  Biology, Mechanism, and Applications. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 67: 657–685.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

8. Liu S, Jaouannet M, Dempsey DMA, Imani J, Coustau C, et al (2020). RNA-based technologies for insect control in plant production. Biotechnol Adv. 39: 107463.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

9. Chen X, Jiang L, Zheng J, Chen F, Wang T, et al (2019).  A missense mutation in Large Grain Size 1 increases grain size and enhances cold tolerance in rice. J Exp Bot. 70: 3851-3866.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

10. Zhang R, Jing Y, Zhang H, Niu Y, Liu C, et al (2018). Comprehensive Evolutionary Analysis of the Major RNA-Induced Silencing Complex Members. Scientific reports. 1–7.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

11. BeLue R, Ndiaye K, NDao F, Ba FNN, Diaw M (2016). Glycemic control in a clinic-based sample of diabetics in M’Bour Senegal. Health Educ Behav. 43: 112S-116S.

     Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

12. Salama MS, Isunju JB, David SK, Muneza F, Ssemanda S, et al (2021). Prevalence and factors associated with alcohol consumption among persons with diabetes in Kampala, Uganda: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health. 21: 719.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

13. Li J, Chattopadhyay K, Xu M, Chen Y, Hu F, et al (2018). Glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients and its predictors: a retrospective database study at a tertiary care diabetes centre in Ningbo, China. BMJ Open. 8: e019697.

     Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

14. Cannata F, Vadalà G, Russo F, Papalia R, Napoli N, et al (2020). Beneficial effects of physical activity in diabetic patients. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 5: 70.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

15. Al-Rasheedi AAS (2014). The role of educational level in glycemic control among patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 8: 177.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref