Journal of Research in International Business and Management

Total Quality Management in Production Systems

Jack Hood^* Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
^*Corresponding Author:
Jack Hood, Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark, Email: jackh66@gmail.com

Received: 22-May-2024, Manuscript No. 138370; Editor assigned: 24-May-2024, Pre QC No. 138370; Reviewed: 11-Jun-2024, QC No. 138370; Revised: 20-Jun-2024, Manuscript No. 138370; Published: 24-Jun-2024, DOI: 10.14303//jribm.2024.024

Introduction

Total Quality Management (TQM) is a comprehensive approach aimed at improving the overall quality of products and services through continuous refinement in response to continuous feedback. In production systems, TQM focuses on enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of all processes, ensuring the highest standards of quality are met throughout the entire production lifecycle.

Fundamental Principles of TQM

TQM is based on several key principles that guide organizations in their quest for quality excellence:

• The primary goal of TQM is to meet or exceed customer expectations. This involves understanding customer needs and requirements and striving to deliver products and services that fulfill these needs.

• TQM emphasizes the need for ongoing improvement in all aspects of the production process. This principle is often implemented through practices like Kaizen, Six Sigma, and other quality improvement methodologies (Amore et al., 2022).

• TQM recognizes that employees at all levels are critical to achieving quality goals. It encourages active participation and empowerment of employees to identify and solve quality issues.

• TQM focuses on improving processes to enhance quality. By analyzing and refining production processes, organizations can reduce variability and defects (Bagire et al., 2021).

• TQM requires a holistic approach where all functions and departments within an organization work together towards common quality objectives.

• TQM relies on data and statistical analysis to inform decision-making. This helps in identifying areas for improvement and measuring the impact of quality initiatives (Chang et al., 2022).

• Effective communication is crucial for the successful implementation of TQM. It ensures that quality goals, policies, and procedures are clearly understood across the organization.

Implementation Strategies

Implementing TQM in production systems involves several strategic steps:

• Top management must demonstrate a strong commitment to quality. This involves setting clear quality objectives, allocating necessary resources, and leading by example (Chen et al., 2021).

• Employees need to be trained in quality management principles and techniques. Continuous education helps in building a culture of quality awareness and competence.

• Organizations need to map out their production processes to identify key areas for improvement. Tools like flowcharts, process diagrams, and value stream mapping are often used (Huang et al., 2022).

• Forming small groups of employees who regularly meet to discuss and solve quality-related problems can foster a collaborative approach to quality improvement.

• Comparing the organization’s processes and performance with industry standards or best practices helps in identifying gaps and setting realistic improvement targets (Rayamajhee et al., 2022).

• TQM extends beyond the organization to include suppliers. Ensuring that suppliers meet quality standards is essential for maintaining overall product quality.

Regularly gathering and analyzing customer feedback provides insights into areas where quality improvements are needed.

Impact on Production Systems

The implementation of TQM in production systems has a profound impact on various aspects of production:

• TQM helps in identifying the root causes of defects and implementing corrective actions, leading to a reduction in waste and rework.

• Streamlined processes and continuous improvement efforts result in more efficient production operations, reducing cycle times and increasing productivity.

• By focusing on meeting customer needs and delivering high-quality products, organizations can achieve higher levels of customer satisfaction and loyalty (Rosenblum et al., 2023).

• TQM fosters a positive work environment where employees feel valued and empowered, leading to higher morale and engagement.

• Organizations that consistently deliver high-quality products can differentiate themselves in the market, gaining a competitive edge.

Improved quality and efficiency translate into cost savings and higher profitability, contributing to better overall financial performance (Sultan, 2022).

Conclusion

Total Quality Management is a vital approach for organizations seeking to enhance the quality of their production systems. By adhering to TQM principles and implementing effective strategies, organizations can achieve significant improvements in product quality, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction. The continuous pursuit of quality excellence not only drives better business outcomes but also fosters a culture of innovation and continuous improvement.

References

Amore, M, Garofalo, O, & Martin-Sanchez, V (2022). Dispositional optimism and business recovery during a pandemic. PloS One. 17(6), e0269707.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Bagire, V, Wafler, M, Rieck, C, Asiimwe, J, Abaho, E, Atisinguza, F, & Namanya, C (2021). Waste as business: emerging Ugandan micro-and small-sized businesses in resource recovery and safe reuse. J Environ Manage. 279, 111802.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Chang, S.E, Brown, C, Handmer, J, Helgeson, J, Kajitani, Y, Keating, A, & Roa-Henriquez, A (2022). Business recovery from disasters: Lessons from natural hazards and the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 80, 103191.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Chen, P.H, Bodak, R, & Gandhi, N.S (2021). Ransomware recovery and imaging operations: lessons learned and planning considerations. J Digit Imaging. 34(3), 731-740.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Huang, C.D, Baghersad, M, Behara, R.S, & Zobel, C.W (2022). Optimal investment in prevention and recovery for mitigating epidemic risks. Risk Anal. 42(1), 206-220.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Rayamajhee, V, Storr, V.H, & Bohara, A.K (2022). Social entrepreneurship, co-production, and post-disaster recovery. Disasters, 46(1), 27-55.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Rosenblum, A.J, Wend, C.M, Akhtar, Z, Rosman, L, Freeman, J.D, & Barnett, D.J (2023). Use of big data in disaster recovery: an integrative literature review. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 17, e68.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Sultan, A. (2022). Assembling and diversifying social contexts of recovery. Int J Drug Policy. 127-159.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Vogel, G (2022). Validating business continuity programmes in the ‘new normal’. J Bus Contin Emer Plan. 15(4), 319-329.

Indexed at, Google Scholar

Zigon, J, Vitellone, N, Duff, C, & Theodoropoulou, L (2022). A conversation about recovery and political activism. Int J Drug Policy. 107, 103614.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Citation: Hood J (2024). Total Quality Management in Production Systems. JRIBM. 11: 024.