GET THE APP

International Research Journals
Reach Us +44 330 818 7254

International Research Journal of Microbiology

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Review Article - International Research Journal of Microbiology ( 2023) Volume 12, Issue 3

The Intermittent Activities of Normal Gut Microbiota and Pathogenic Bacteria

Eriana Groud*
 
Department of Microbiology, Stockhlom University, Sweden
 
*Corresponding Author:
Eriana Groud, Department of Microbiology, Stockhlom University, Sweden, Email: ground23@su.ac.in

Received: 01-May-2023, Manuscript No. IRJM-23-98244; Editor assigned: 03-May-2023, Pre QC No. IRJM-23-98244 (PQ); Reviewed: 17-May-2023, QC No. IRJM-23-98244; Revised: 19-May-2023, Manuscript No. IRJM-23-98244 (R); Published: 26-May-2023, DOI: 10.14303/2141-5463.2023.39

Abstract

The human microbiome plays a crucial role in health. The microbiota can either give pathogenic bacteria resistance or make it easier for them to get sick. The nutritional landscape of the gut is altered as a result of antibiotics' profound impact on the microbiota, which can result in the expansion of pathogenic populations. To boost their own growth and virulence, pathogenic bacteria rely on carbon and nitrogen from the microbiota as nutrients and regulatory signals. These bacteria change the environment in the intestines by causing inflammation. They also use unique mechanisms for respiration and metal acquisition to grow. Strategies for manipulating the microbiota to combat infectious diseases will emerge from unraveling the interactions that occur between the microbiota, the host, and pathogenic bacteria.

Keywords

Micro biome, Pathogenic bacteria, Microbiota, Inflammation

INTRODUCTION

In the past ten years, there has been a steady increase in awareness of the significant role that the microbiota play in human nutrition and health. The initial research's primary objectives were to identify the microbial species that make up the microbiota and establish a link between the microbiota's composition and the host's health or disease status. Mechanistic studies, in particular those that concentrate on associations between the microbiota, the host, and pathogenic bacteria, are facilitated by technologies and interdisciplinary research during the current renaissance. Invigorating exploration is presently beginning to disentangle how the sythesis of the microbiota can offer either obstruction or help to attacking pathogenic species. Most of this review was directed in the gastrointestinal parcel, in which relationship between the host furthermore, organisms are of central significance. The stomach microbiota of every individual is novel at the variety and species levels; notwithstanding, it is all the more for the most part monitored at the phylum level, which is populated most unmistakably by Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, trailed by Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria (Yurist Doutsch S, 2014).

The microbiota can boost resistance to pathogenic species colonization. For example, mice that are treated with antitoxins or that are reproduced in sterile conditions (known as microorganism free mice) are more powerless to intestinal pathogenic microscopic organisms, for example, Shigella flexneri, Citrobacter rodentium, Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica. Furthermore, some microbiotas can prompt the extension or upgraded destructiveness of pathogenic populations. One notable illustration is how the susceptibility of mice to C. rodentium infection is determined by differences in the microbiota composition: In animals that were previously immune to infection, the transplantation of microbiotas from susceptible mouse strains resulted in similar susceptibility, and in animals that were previously immune to infection, the transplantation of microbiotas from resistant animals resulted in resistance to infection. This idea is supported by epidemiological surveys. In a study of Swedish adults16, it was discovered that the species composition of the microbiotas influenced differences in susceptibility to infection with Campylobacter jejuni (Sassone Corsi M, 2015) (Cameron EA, 2015).

When compared to individuals who had low diversity in their microbiotas and lacked an abundance of bacteria from the genera Dorea and Coprococcus, those with higher diversity were significantly more resistant to C. jejuni infection (Pacheco AR, 2015).

Inhibitory signals from microbiota and host

The risks and course of enteric diseases are influenced by the microbiota. Vibrio cholerae is a major cause of explosive diarrhea in which the population of microbes in the intestine is significantly disrupted. A specific microbiota signature is found in the faecal microbiota of cholera patients in Bangladesh, according to metagenomic studies. The infectivity of V. cholerae is limited by the reconstitution of this microbiota in germ-free mice. Through the production of the furanone signal autoinducer-2, which causes the repression of several V. cholerae colonization factors 55, Ruminococcus obeum can specifically hinder V. cholerae colonization of the intestines. EHEC's use of microbiotaderived signals in the colonization of its ruminal reservoir is another example of how they affect host colonization. EHEC only colonizes the recto-butt-centric intersection of grownup steers. EHEC reprograms itself to survive the acidic pH of the animal's stomachs and to successfully colonize the rectoanal junction56 by detecting acyl-homoserine lactone signals from the rumen microbiota through the sensor protein SdiA. Pathogenic bacteria can detect hostderived signals that have been altered by the microbiota to modulate their virulence in addition to being able to directly detect signals that are derived from the microbiota. V. cholerae has a sort VI emission framework (T6SS), which it uses to kill different microorganisms. V. cholerae encounters the mucosal microbiota during its colonization of the intestine, which can alter the bile acid composition there. For instance, Bifidobacterium bifidum adversely directs the T6SS movement of V. cholerae through the metabolic transformation of three bile acids (glycodeoxycholic corrosive, taurodeoxycholic corrosive and cholic corrosive) into the bile corrosive deoxycholic corrosive. T6SS gene expression is reduced by deoxycholic acid, but not by its unmodified salts. This prompts a lessening in the killing of E. coli by V. cholerae inferable from bile-corrosive change by different commensals, which diminishes the movement of the T6SS57 (Bohnhoff M, 1954). The neurotransmitter noradrenaline is another host signal that has been altered by the microbiota and is recognized by pathogenic bacteria. The stomach is exceptionally innervated, and synapses are significant signs in the gastrointestinal plot, where they tweak peristalsis, the progression of blood and the emission of ions. Neurotransmitter biosynthesis and availability in the intestinal lumen are influenced by the microbiota. The microbiota, for instance, stimulates the biosynthesis of serotonin, and the enzymatic activities derived from the microbiota raise the levels of active noradrenaline in the gut lumen. Adrenergic neurons in the enteric nervous system produce noradrenaline, which is then conjugated with glucuronic acid by the host to become inactive (to produce a glucuronide). Glucuronidases, enzymes produced by the microbiota, then deconjugate glucuronic acid from noradrenaline, increasing the amount of active noradrenaline in the intestine lumen. A few pathogenic microorganisms of the stomach, including EHEC, S. Typhimurium and V. arahaemolyticus, sense noradrenaline to actuate the declaration of destructiveness genes (Ferreira RB, 2011).

Associated inflammation

Although the microbiota and diet have a significant impact on the availability of nutrients in the gut, the host also plays a significant role. The inflammatory response of the host is a crucial driver of changes in the environment of the gut. Gastrointestinal aggravation in individuals is related with a lopsidedness in the microbiota, known as dysbiosis, and is described by a decreased variety of organisms, a diminished overflow of commit anaerobic microbes and an extension of facultative anaerobic microscopic organisms in the phylum Proteobacteria, generally individuals from the family Enterobacteriaceae. Mice with chemically induced colitis and genetically induced colitis75 exhibit similar changes in the composition of the gut microbiota. The host's inflammatory response probably contributed to the altered nutritional environment that led to these changes in the microbiota's structure (Sprinz H, 1961).

The accessibility of supplements in the digestive organ is adjusted during irritation through changes in the organization of mucous sugars. When mice and rhesus macaques are infected with S. typhimurium interleukin (IL)-22, a cytokine that is prominently induced in the intestinal mucosa, increases the (1,2)-fucosylation of mucus carbohydrates and epithelial expression of galactoside 2-L- fucosyltransferase 2. Fucose can be liberated from mucus carbohydrates by the gut microbiota which induces E. coli genes for fucose utilization. In a similar vein, S. typhimurium induced colitis in mice results in an increase in glycan fucosylation, which is correlated with an increase in the synthesis of proteins involved in fucose utilization. Changes in the composition of the gut microbiota caused by mucus fucosylation induced by C. rodentium infection help to protect the host from the pathobiont Enterococcus faecalis expansion and epithelial translocation (Zachar Z, 1979) (Kamada N, 2012).

During inflammation, pathogenic bacteria from the family Enterobacteriaceae use a variety of tactics to invade the gut ecosystem, one of which is the establishment of a niche for nutrients that are needed by the respiratory system. Without any irritation or treatment with anti-infection agents, individuals from the stomach microbiota possess all suitable supplement specialties, which make it very trying for pathogenic Enterobacteriaceae to enter the local area. S. typhimurium uses this strategy to force the host into creating a new niche of respiratory nutrients that is suitable for its expansion. This could be accomplished by these bacteria causing intestinal inflammation. S. typhimurium uses T3SS-1 to enter the intestinal epithelium upon ingestion and T3SS-2 to survive within the host's tissue95. Acute intestinal inflammation is triggered by both of these processes in mouse models of gastroenteritis and cattle. The inflammatory response of the host causes S. typhimurium to expand in the gut lumen, which is necessary for the faecal– oral transmission of this pathogenic species to a new host (Ghosh S, 2011).

CONCLUSION

More than a century ago, researchers began investigating the microbiome. The first insights into the taxonomic makeup of microbial communities came from sequencing 16S rRNA genes. Later, sequencing the entire metagenome of microbial communities provided a deeper understanding of the community's full genetic potential. The utilization of microbe free creatures, either alone or in mix with arising advances, for example, laser-catch microdissection and transcriptomics, empowered robotic investigations of the affiliations between the microbiota, the host and pathogenic bacteria. Researchers can now investigate the assembly of microbe communities as well as their shared and strainspecific dietary requirements using multi-taxon insertion sequencing, which has also made it easier to manipulate such communities through diet. The development of quantitative imaging technologies has made it possible to study the interactions and proximity of microbes as well as the localization of microbes within the gastrointestinal tract. The rising refinement and force of metabolomics, imaging mass spectrometry and three-layered planning of mass-spectrometry information give a high-goal picture of the intricate science scene of the collaborations among organisms and the host, which makes way for controlling this science to forestall or treat irresistible diseases.

REFERENCES

  1. Yurist Doutsch S, Arrieta MC, Vogt SL, Finlay BB (2014). Gastrointestinal microbiota-mediated control of enteric pathogens. Annu Rev Genet. 48: 361-382.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Sassone Corsi M, Raffatellu M (2015). How beneficial microbes cooperate with immunity to provide colonization resistance to pathogens. J Immunol.  194: 4081-4087.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Cameron EA, Sperandio V (2015). Frenemies: signaling and nutritional integration in pathogen microbiota–host interactions. Cell Host Microbe. 18: 275-284.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7.  Pacheco AR, Sperandio V (2015). Enteric pathogens exploit the microbiota-generated nutritional environment of the gut. Microbiol Spectr. 3: MBP-0001–2014.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Bohnhoff M, Drake BL, Miller CP (1954). Effect of streptomycin on susceptibility of intestinal tract to experimental Salmonella infection. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 86: 132-137.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Ferreira RB (2011). The intestinal microbiota plays a role in Salmonella-induced colitis independent of pathogen colonization. PLoS ONE. 6: e20338.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Sprinz H (1961). The response of the germfree guinea pig to oral bacterial challenge with Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri. Am J Pathol.  39: 681-695.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Zachar Z, Savage DC (1979). Microbial interference and colonization of the murine gastro intestinal tract by Listeria monocytogenes. Infect Immun. 23: 168-174.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Kamada N (2012). Regulated virulence controls the ability of a pathogen to compete with the gut microbiota. Science. 336: 1325-1329.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Ghosh S (2011). Colonic microbiota alters host susceptibility to infectious colitis by modulating inflammation, redox status, and ion transporter gene expression. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 301: G39-G49.
  20. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref