GET THE APP

International Research Journals

Educational Research

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Case Series - Educational Research ( 2023) Volume 14, Issue 2

Problems with Teacher Qualification are caused for Student Learning

Stella Perini*
 
Department of Education, University of Vienna, Sensengasse 3A, 1090 Vienna, Austria
 
*Corresponding Author:
Stella Perini, Department of Education, University of Vienna, Sensengasse 3A, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Email: StellaP@gmail.com

Received: 03-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. Er-23-92348; Editor assigned: 06-Mar-2023, Pre QC No. Er-23-92348; Reviewed: 20-Mar-2023, QC No. Er-23-92348; Revised: 27-Mar-2023, Manuscript No. Er-23-92348; Published: 31-Mar-2023, DOI: 10.14303/2141-5161.2023.258

Abstract

The role of a teacher in shaping the learning of a student is pivotal, and teacher qualifications have a significant impact on student learning outcomes. The qualifications of a teacher include their academic background, teaching experience, and pedagogical skills, which collectively shape their ability to deliver effective instruction to students. The quality of instruction is one of the most important factors that influence student learning

Keywords

Education, Teachers, Student learning, Academic qualifications

INTRODUCTION

Teachers who are well-qualified are better equipped to deliver quality instruction, which in turn helps students to learn more effectively. For instance, teachers with a strong background in their subject matter are able to provide students with a deeper understanding of the subject matter, which can motivate them to pursue further studies in the field. In addition to subject matter expertise, teachers must possess pedagogical skills to be effective in the classroom. Pedagogical skills refer to a teacher's ability to design and deliver instruction in a manner that is engaging, informative, and tailored to the needs of each student (de Jonge P et al., 2018) (Park C et al., 2013). Teachers with strong pedagogical skills are able to provide individualized instruction to students, which help them to learn more effectively. Research studies have consistently shown that teacher qualifications are positively correlated with student learning outcomes. For instance, a study by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) found that the qualifications of a teacher are one of the most important factors that impact student learning outcomes. Another study by the National Centre for Education Statistics (NCES) found that students who are taught by highly qualified teachers achieve higher scores on standardized tests (Sarris J et al., 2014).

DISCUSSION

In addition to academic qualifications and pedagogical skills, teaching experience also plays a significant role in shaping student learning outcomes (Liem A et al., 2017) (Vohra S et al., 2005). Experienced teachers are better equipped to identify the unique learning needs of each student and design instruction accordingly. They are also able to provide valuable insights into the challenges that students face in the learning process and design interventions to address those challenges. The concept of linking teacher qualification to student learning has gained traction in recent years, with many educational policymakers and stakeholders advocating for this approach. The idea is that the better qualified the teacher, the better the student learning outcomes will be. While this may seem like a logical approach, it is not without its problems. One of the main issues with linking teacher qualification to student learning is that it assumes that student learning outcomes are entirely dependent on the teacher's qualifications. This overlooks the role that other factors, such as the student's socio-economic background, motivation, and prior knowledge, play in determining student outcomes. Research has consistently shown that these factors have a significant impact on student learning, and while a qualified teacher can certainly help mitigate their effects, they cannot be entirely overcome by teacher qualifications alone (Grace S et al., 2010).

Another problem with linking teacher qualification to student learning is that it can lead to a narrow focus on test scores and other measurable outcomes. This can create a pressure-filled environment that prioritizes rote learning and test-taking strategies over deeper learning and critical thinking. In some cases, it can also lead to a situation where teachers "teach to the test," neglecting broader educational goals in favour of improving test scores (Templeman K et al., 2011). There is also a risk that linking teacher qualification to student learning can lead to a culture of blame and accountability, where teachers are held responsible for outcomes that are not entirely within their control. This can create a negative work environment, with teachers feeling undervalued and underappreciated, and can lead to high turnover rates and difficulties in attracting and retaining qualified teachers (Lake J et al., 2012). Furthermore, defining teacher qualification in a narrow and rigid way can also exclude many excellent educators who do not meet the prescribed qualifications. In some cases, these educators may have extensive experience or a unique skill set that would benefit their students, but their lack of formal qualifications may prevent them from teaching (Pengpid S et al., 2018) (Stepleman LM et al., 2015).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, teacher qualifications are a critical factor that determines the quality of instruction that students receive, which in turn influences their learning outcomes. Teachers who possess strong subject matter expertise, pedagogical skills, and teaching experience are better equipped to provide high-quality instruction to students, which help them to learn more effectively. Policymakers must prioritize investments in teacher training and development to ensure that every student has access to high-quality instruction that meets their unique learning needs, while the concept of linking teacher qualification to student learning may seem like a logical approach; it is not without its problems. It can overlook the role that other factors play in determining student outcomes, lead to a narrow focus on test scores, create a culture of blame and accountability, and exclude excellent educators who do not meet the prescribed qualifications. Policymakers and stakeholders must take a more holistic approach to teacher qualifications, one that recognizes the complexity of student learning and the many factors that contribute to it.

REFERENCES

  1. de Jonge P, Wardenaar KJ, Hoenders H, Evans-Lacko S, Kovess-Masfety V, et al (2018). Complementary and alternative medicine contacts by persons with mental disorders in 25 countries: results from the world mental health surveys. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 27: 552-567.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  3. Park C (2013). Mind-body CAM interventions: Current status and considerations for integration into clinical health psychology. J Clin Psychol. 69: 45-63.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  5. Sarris J, Glick R, Hoenders R, Duffy J, Lake J, et al (2014). Integrative mental healthcare White paper: establishing a new paradigm through research, education, and clinical guidelines. Adv Int Med. 1: 9-16.
  6. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  7. Liem A, Rahmawati KD (2017). The meaning of complementary, alternative and traditional medicine among the Indonesian psychology community: a pilot study. J Int Med. 15: 288-294.
  8. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  9. Vohra S, Feldman K, Johnston B, Waters K, Boon H, et al (2005). Integrating complementary and alternative medicine into academic medical centers: experience and perceptions of nine leading centers in North America. BMC Health Serv Res. 5: 78-84.
  10. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  11. Grace S, Higgs J (2010). Integrative medicine: enhancing quality in primary health care. J Altern Complement Med. 16: 945–950.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  13. Templeman K, Robinson A (2011). Integrative medicine models in contemporary primary health care. Complement Ther Med. 19: 84-92.
  14. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  15. Lake J, Helgason C, Sarris J (2012). Integrative mental health (IMH): paradigm, research, and clinical practice. The Journal of Science and Healing. 8: 50-57.
  16. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  17. Pengpid S, Peltzer K (2018). Utilization of traditional and complementary medicine in Indonesia: results of a national survey in 2014-15. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 33: 156-163.
  18. Indexed at, Google Scholar, Crossref

  19. Stepleman LM, Penwell-Waines L, Valvano A (2015). Integrated care psychologists and their role in patient transition from medical to psychiatric specialty care settings: a conceptual model. Health Psychol Behav Med. 3: 154-168.
  20. Google Scholar, Crossref

Copyright: ©2023 International Research Journals This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.