Opinion - International Research Journal of Plant Science ( 2024) Volume 15, Issue 3
Published: 28-Jun-2024, DOI: http:/dx.doi.org/10.14303/irjps.2024.26
Phytoremediation is an innovative, eco-friendly, and cost-effective approach to mitigate environmental pollution using plants. It harnesses the natural processes of certain plant species to remove, transfer, stabilize, or destroy contaminants from soil, water, and air. This technique is particularly valuable in dealing with heavy metals, organic pollutants, and other toxic substances that result from industrial, agricultural, and urban activities (Chaney.,et al 1997).
In recent years, phytoremediation has gained significant attention due to its environmental sustainability, potential for restoring degraded ecosystems, and economic viability compared to traditional remediation methods. This article explores the types, processes, advantages, and limitations of phytoremediation, as well as the potential it holds for addressing environmental challenges (Cunningham.,et al 1996).
In this process, plants absorb contaminants, primarily heavy metals, through their roots and store them in their stems, leaves, or other tissues. Hyperaccumulators, which are specialized plants capable of absorbing high concentrations of heavy metals, are often used in phytoextraction. Once the contaminants are stored in the plant biomass, the plants can be harvested and properly disposed of. Some common examples of hyperaccumulator plants include Brassica juncea (Indian mustard) and Thlaspi caerulescens (Gerhardt.,et al 2017).
Phytostabilization works by using plants to immobilize contaminants in the soil, preventing them from leaching into groundwater or being spread by wind. Plants stabilize the contaminants through root exudates or by binding them to soil particles. The contaminants remain in the soil, but they are no longer mobile or bioavailable, reducing their impact on the environment. This process is often employed for heavy metals, radionuclides, and other inorganic pollutants.
Also known as phytotransformation, this method involves plants breaking down organic pollutants into less harmful substances through metabolic processes. Enzymes produced by the plants help degrade contaminants such as petroleum hydrocarbons, pesticides, and industrial solvents into non-toxic or less toxic forms. In this way, plants serve as bio-catalysts to clean up contaminated sites. Poplars and willows are frequently used in phytodegradation due to their fast growth and deep root systems (Ghosh,.,et al 2015).
In phytovolatilization, plants take up contaminants through their roots and release them as volatile compounds into the atmosphere via transpiration. This method is most effective for contaminants like mercury, selenium, and some organic compounds. Although phytovolatilization helps remove contaminants from soil or water, there is some concern about the pollutants being transferred into the air, where they could cause secondary pollution (Pilon.,et al 2002).
This method focuses on the use of plant roots to absorb and concentrate contaminants, particularly heavy metals, from contaminated water. The roots act as a filter, trapping pollutants from water as it flows through them. Rhizofiltration is particularly effective in cleaning up wastewater, surface water, and groundwater that has been contaminated with toxic metals like lead, cadmium, or chromium. Sunflowers and Indian mustard are among the plants commonly used for rhizofiltration (Salt.,et al 2002).
A comprehensive analysis of the contaminated site is conducted to determine the type, concentration, and distribution of pollutants. Soil composition, water table levels, and climate conditions are also considered to select the most appropriate phytoremediation strategy and plant species.The choice of plants is critical to the success of phytoremediation. Different plant species have different capabilities for absorbing, accumulating, or degrading contaminants. Factors such as the plant's tolerance to contaminants, growth rate, root system, and ease of cultivation must be considered (Salt.,et al 2002).
The selected plants are grown on the contaminated site, and their development is closely monitored. This phase may take several years, depending on the severity of the contamination and the plant species used. Some phytoremediation projects may involve the use of genetic engineering to enhance the plant’s ability to absorb or degrade pollutants more efficiently(Schnoor.,et al 1995).
During the phytoremediation process, regular monitoring of soil, water, and plant tissues is required to track the progress of contaminant removal. In the case of phytoextraction, once the plants have accumulated sufficient amounts of contaminants, they are harvested, and their biomass is treated and safely disposed of to prevent secondary contamination.Phytoremediation is generally slower than traditional methods, often taking several years or even decades to fully clean up a site. This may not be practical for locations where rapid decontamination is needed (Trapp.,et al 2001).
Since plant roots typically grow only a few meters deep, phytoremediation is not suitable for treating deep soil contamination or groundwater that lies far below the surface.Not all contaminants can be effectively removed using plants. Phytoremediation is most effective for heavy metals and certain organic pollutants, but it may not work for all hazardous substances (Watanabe.,et al 1997).
Phytoremediation is a promising and sustainable solution for addressing environmental contamination. Its ability to use natural processes to restore ecosystems and remove harmful pollutants makes it a powerful tool in the fight against pollution. Although it has its limitations, ongoing research and advancements in plant science hold the potential to expand its applications and improve its efficiency. In a world facing growing environmental challenges, phytoremediation represents a vital component of the green technology arsenal, offering hope for a cleaner and healthier future.
Chaney, R. L., Malik, M., Li, Y. M., Brown, S. L., Brewer, et al,. (1997). Phytoremediation of soil metals. Current opinion in Biotechnology, 8(3), 279-284.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Cunningham, S. D., & Ow, D. W. (1996). Promises and prospects of phytoremediation. Plant physiology, 110(3), 715.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Gerhardt, K. E., Gerwing, P. D., & Greenberg, B. M. (2017). Opinion: Taking phytoremediation from proven technology to accepted practice. Plant Science, 256, 170-185.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Ghosh, M., & Singh, S. P. (2005). A review on phytoremediation of heavy metals and utilization of it’s by products. Asian J Energy Environ, 6(4), 18.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Pilon-Smits, E., & Pilon, M. (2002). Phytoremediation of metals using transgenic plants. Critical reviews in plant sciences, 21(5), 439-456.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Salt, D. E., Smith, R. D., & Raskin, I. (1998). Phytoremediation. Annual review of plant biology, 49(1), 643-668.
Salt, D. E., Smith, R. D., (1999). The Phytoremediation. Annual review of plant biology, 49(1), 643-668.
Schnoor, J. L., Light, L. A., McCutcheon, S. C., Wolfe, N. L., & Carreia, L. H. (1995). Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environmental science & technology, 29(7), 318A-323A.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Trapp, S., & Karlson, U. (2001). Aspects of phytoremediation of organic pollutants. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 1, 37-43.
Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref
Watanabe, M. E. (1997). Phytoremediation on the brink of commericialization. Environmental science & technology, 31(4), 182A-186A.