GET THE APP

International Research Journals

International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Research Article - International Research Journal of Agricultural Science and Soil Science ( 2022) Volume 11, Issue 5

Land Evaluation of the Wetland Soils of Ogba Egbema Ndoni LGA for Some Selected Crops

Ezebunwo CP, Amadi-Rapheal KAS*, Wokocha CC and Ikiriko ME
 
Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Port Harcourt, P.M.B. 5323 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria
 
*Corresponding Author:
Amadi-Rapheal KAS, Department of Crop and Soil Science, University of Port Harcourt, P.M.B. 5323 Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria, Tel: (+234) 8068521214, Email: kurotamunoye.jack@uniport.edu.ng

Received: 29-Aug-2022, Manuscript No. IRJAS-22-52096; Editor assigned: 31-Aug-2022, Pre QC No. IRJAS-22-52096; Reviewed: 14-Sep-2022, QC No. IRJAS-22-52096; Revised: 19-Sep-2022, Manuscript No. IRJAS-22-52096; Published: 26-Sep-2022, DOI: 10.14303/2251-0044.2022.16

Abstract

The present study was carried out to evaluate the potential of the wetland soils in Ogba-Egbema-Ndoni LGA Rivers State in Nigeria for three selected crops (Cassava, Oil Palm and Maize). Three modal profile pits were dug and described based on FAO guidelines for soil profile description. The soils texture of the study was mostly loamy sand and sandy loam. Soil reaction (pH) tended to be very strongly acidic to moderately acidic with a range of 4.5 to 5.2. Three standard Land Evaluation methods were used; Land suitability, Land capability and fertility capability classification (FCC) to evaluate the selected crops. The results revealed that the land capability classification of the soils were moderately capable with limitations of fertility for profile B2PR and B3OKS with profile BIOSI having limitation of wetness. For suitability classification all soils were marginally suitable for cassava, for maize profile BIOSI and B3OKS were marginally suitable, while B2PR was moderately suitable and for oil palm profile B2PR and B3OKS were moderately suitable and BIOSI was marginally suitable. For fertility capability classification, the soils were classified as SSKeg, SLkeg and SSkeg.

Keywords

Wetland, Land capability classification, Land suitability Evaluation and Fertility capability classification, Cassava, Oil palm, Maize

INTRODUCTION

Soil is a vital natural resource necessary for crop production, and sustainable soil management is the key to sustainable agricultural production. Soil resources played important role in agricultural production. Therefore, there are urgent needs to match soil type and land use for sustainable food production for the teaming population of a country like Nigeria. Wetlands are frequently transitional landscapes between terrestrial and aquatic systems and therefore possess characteristics of both. Wetlands are among the most productive and economically valuable ecosystems in the world. They provide critical ecosystem goods and services, including carbon storage, biodiversity, conservation, fish production, fuel production, water purification, flood and shoreline surge protection and erosion control, and recreation Moreno-Mateos D et al., (2012). Wetland resources constitute an important agricultural ecology in the world and are major contributors of economic growth of the society. Wetlands are distinguished by the presence of water, either at the surface or within the root zone, seasonally or permanently and often have unique soil conditions that differ from adjacent uplands, and they support vegetation adapted to the wet condition (hydrophytes) Mitsch and Gosselink (2000). It is therefore necessary that policy makers carefully determine appropriate strategies for the sustainable use and management of wetlands for agriculture or other purposes. Development of such policies and strategies can only be possible where information, on the characteristics and functioning of wetlands is carefully collected, assembled and interpreted. The process of assessing these wetlands to meet the user’s need is called land evaluation and this serves as the basis for proper land use planning Fasina and Adeyanju (2007). The objective of the study was to generate information about wetlands soils in Ogba/Egbema/ Ndoni Local Government Area in Nigeria, to contribute to the database required for the precise characterization, classification, evaluation and understanding of wetland resources in Nigeria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study area is located in Ogba/Egbema/Ndoni L.G.A of Rivers State (Figure 1). The location selected was Egbeda, Osiakpo and Okansu lie on latitude 5.33ï?°N and longitude 6.69ï?°E.The soil is predominantly Sandy loam and Loamy sand. The area has a humid tropical climate annual rainfall distribution which ranges from 2800mm to 3500mm per annum, with an annual Temperature range of 26ï?°C – 31ï?°C throughout the year with a high relative humidity. The area covers over 1,500ha of farm land. Soils of Ogba/ Egbema/ Ndoni are derived from coastal plain sands. The area has a swamp mixture and rainforest with different types of trees with coconut (Cocoa nucifera dominating plant species including palm trees, cocoyams, vegetables), and agroforestry (Oil palms, Heveabrasiliensis, Irvingia sp., Cola sp., Musa sp.).

international-research-geographical

Figure 1. Geographical map of the study area.

Three modal profile pits were dug and described according to international standard of profile description. Soil samples were collected at different genetic horizons and sent to the laboratory for analysis. The samples were collected from the deepest horizon upward to avoid contamination. The samples were placed in appropriate labeled polythene bags and transported to the laboratory. All the soil samples were air-dried under shade for 1 week, crushed with pistle and mortal and passed through a 2mm sieve prior to routine laboratory analysis. Morphological Properties of the soil colours of the pedons were identified using Munsell colour chart. Other morphological properties examined were the depth, texture, structure, consistency and horizon boundary of each horizon. The morphological properties of each pedon was described according to Soil Survey Staff (2010), while the horizons were identified and designated according to the keys to soil taxonomy and World reference base system 2014.

Laboratory analysis

The particle size fractions were determined by the modified Bouyoucos hydrometer method (Anderson and Ingram, 1993). The soil hydraulic conductivity were determined by core sampling method, this was determined using undisturbed soil cores samples using a constant head permeameter method Klute (1986) and calculated using the transposed Darcy’s equation for the vertical flow of liquids. The soil pH was determined using glass electrode pH meter both in distilled water and in 0.1N KCl suspension using soil- liquid ratio of 1:2.5. Soil organic carbon was determined by the Walkley and Black wet digestion method as contained. Total nitrogen was determined by the modified macro- kjeldahl digestion and distillation method as described. Available phosphorus was evaluated by Bray P1 method of Bray and Kurtz (1945); while exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, K and Na) were extracted by neutral NH4OAC. Calcium, Potassium and Sodium were measured through flame photometer, while Magnessium was determined by Atomic Absorption spectrophotometer Rhoades (1982). Exchangeable acidity was determined by 1N KCl extraction and titrated with 0.05N NaOH solution Black (1975). Effective Cation Exchange Capacity (ECEC) was calculated by the summation of the values of exchangeable cations and exchangeable acidity. The micro- nutrients (Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn) were determined in 1N HCl and evaluated using the AAS. Base saturation was computed as the summation of the basic cations.

Land evaluation

The potentials of these soils for cassava, maize and oil palm were assessed using the following land evaluation methods:

1. Land Capability Classification (LCC) as modified by USDA Klingebiel and Montgomery (1961)

2. Land Suitability Evaluation (LSE)

3. Fertility Capability Classification (FCC) Sanchez PA, et al., (2003).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Morphological and physical characteristics

Data on morphological properties of the study soils are presented in (Table 1). Groundwater was encountered in all the profiles. The soils of the study area are varied from poorly to moderately drained which is a characteristic of wetland soils, Differences were observed in texture, structure, consistence. All the soils are mottled or gleyed and have a hue of 10YR. The major morphological features such as grey mottles observed in these pedons is an indication of soil wetness brought about by oxidation-reduction cycles due to ground water fluctuation. Ahn (1970), Smyth and Montgomery (1962) reported inter-relationship between these features. The iron present in these soils impact grayish colour on the soil matrix. The physical properties are presented in (Table 1). The particle size distribution pattern showed that the sand content is very high in all the profiles and ranges from (73.8% to 87.8%), Silt (2% to 14%) and clay (6.2% to 16.2%). This sandy nature can be attributed to the parent materials of the area, coastal plain sands Akamigbo (2000). Reported highest acidity in sand- sized fractions of tropical soils. Akamigbo (1984) reported low silt content in soils of south eastern Nigeria. This indicates the degree of leaching it has undergone and the type of parent material. The data for bulk density are given in (Table 1). The results show that B3OKS had the highest mean bulk density of (1.59g/cm3) and the lowest mean bulk density at B1OSI (1.40g/cm3). Vertically down the profile, bulk density decreased with depth in B1OSI. The value of bulk density is often dependent on soil texture, organic matter, root penetration and soil structure. According to, increase in bulk density maybe due to lower organic matter content. The data for saturated hydraulic conductivity presented in (Table 1) shows a very wide range mean value (32.22- 42.65cm/hr). The Ksat permeability rate was rapid using Darcy’s rating. The saturated hydraulic conductivity was very rapid at 0-15cm soil at B2PR and 0-20cm soil at B3OKS. This can be as a result of high sand and high proportion of macro pores which have implications for infiltration of water into the soil and availability of water to plant roots and leaching losses Kamalu, et al., (2017).

Table 1. Morphologiical features & physical properties of the soils of the study area.


Horizon
Depth Colour Mottling Gleying Texture Structure Consistence Roots Hb Clay Silt Sand BD Ksat
(cm) (moist) % % % g/cm3 (cm/hr)
B1OSI                            
1 0-16 Black Absent Absent LS G Fri Mmi,ma &me r Cs 8.2 6 85.8 1.6 41.34
(10YR2/1)
2 16-54 Brown Present Absent SL G Fri Mmi,ma  Gw 10.2 14 75.8 1.56 28.56
(10YR 4/3) &me r
3 54-74 Light yellowish brown(10YR 6/4) Present Present SL Sab Fri Fwr Gw 14.2 6 79.2 1.31 51.54
4 74-164 Very pale Present Present SL Ab Fi Fwr Gw 14.2 12 73.8 1.11 7.43
 Brown(10YR 8/4)
Mean                         1.4 32.22
B2PR 2                            
1 0-15 Dark greyish brown Absent Absent LS G Fri M  mi,ma r Cw 12.2 4 83.8 1.51 83.33
(10YR 4/2)
2 15-28 Brown Absent Absent LS G Fri Mma,mi Gw 10.2 4 85.8 1.24 71.39
(10YR 4/3) me r
3 28-50 Dark yellowish brown ( 10YR  4/4) Absent Absent LS Ab Fi Fw mi,ma,me r Gw 12.2 4 83.8 1.73 30.6
4 50-70 White (10YR 8/1) Present Absent SL Asb Fi Fwr Cw 16.2 8 75.8 1.61 9.17
5 70-136 Very pale Present Present LS Sab Fi Fwr - 14.2 2 83.8 1.67 9.66
brown(10YR 8/4)
 
Mean                         1.55 40.83
 
B3OKS
1 0-20 Very dark gray Absent Absent LS g Fri Mmi ma r & Cw 10.2 4 85.8 1.67 78.76
(10YR 3/1) fw me
2 20-45 Brown (10YR 5/3) Absent Absent S G Fri fwr,Mme Gs 6.2 6 87.8 1.39 69
3 45-60 Light gray Present Present LS Ab Fri fwr,fwme Cw 14.2 6 79.8 1.67 16.38
(10YR 7/1)
4 60-176 White(7.5YR 8/1) Present Present SL Ab Fi fwr,fw me 12.8 13.4 73.8 1.62 6.47
Mean                       1.59 42.65
Key: LS=Loamy sand, SL=Sandy loam, S=Sand, g=granular, ab=Angular blocky, sab= Sub-angular blocky, Fri=friable, Fi=firm, fwr=few roots, fw me=few mesophytic roots, Mme=many mesophytic roots, fw mi,ma&me r=few micro, macro and mesophytic roots, M ma,mi &me r= Many macro,micro,mesophytic roots. Hb=horizon boundary, Cs=clear smooth, cw=clear wavy, gs=gradual smooth, gw= gradual wavy, Ksat=saturated hydraulic conductive.

Chemical properties of the study area

Soil reaction: The chemical properties of the study soils are presented in (Table 2). The soils very strongly acidic to moderately acidic. The pH (kcl) ranged from 4.5-5.2. The kcl brought more of the acidity to the soil solution, leading to the exchange complex being dominated by Al3+ and H+ ions. The pH values of the study soils agree with the assertion of that such reaction is characteristic of soils in Nigeria’s South- eastern region and is the result of acidic nature of parent rocks, coupled with the influence of leached profiles under higher annual rainfall conditions.

Total organic carbon: The total organic carbon content soil in the soil profile B1OSI ranges from 5.88-8.68% with a mean value of 7.02%, B2PR soil range from 6.3%-7.74% with a mean value of 7.07% and B3OKS soil with a mean value of 7.12%. The organic matter content varied across the different soil horizons, of the soil ranged from low–high, (10.11-15.14%) for all the profiles and Organic carbon was low to medium in the pedions.

Total nitrogen: Total nitrogen was low. The mean values for the three profiles were 0.20%, 0.068% and 0.078% respectively. This compares well with the report of that N is normally deficient in most wetland soils for growing. The low levels may be associated with leaching coupled with intermittent flooding and drying which is known to favour N loss through nitrification-denitrification process.

Available phosphorus: Concentration of available phosphorous varied across the different soil horizons and ranged from 1.499mg/kg, 3.07mg/kg and 3.43mg/kg B1OSI, B2PR and B3OKS respectively, Available phosphorous in the pedons were relatively low. The low content of available phosphorus in these soils could be attributed to the pH level of the soils, similar observation has been made by in similar soils. The low available phosphorus in the area could be due to the nature of parent material in the area and to a limited extent, erosion, leaching and low organic matter content in the area. Reported that available Phosphorous is generally low for all the wetland soils, with average values less than 15mg/kg.

Potassium: Potassium deficiency occurred in all the profiles because all the soils in the study area are very high in sand content , the sandy texture of the soils in the soil must have encouraged the leaching of the available soil nutrients as K+ which are highly soluble. And potassium plays a lot of roles in plants such as protein synthesis, opening and closing of stomata, activation of some enzymes, phloem solute transport, and maintenance of cation: anion balance in the cystol and vacuole, a deficiency in K will impair a plants ability to maintain the processes.

Exchangeable cations: Calcium and Magnesium are the predominant exchangeable bases. The cation distribution is in the order: Mg >Ca>Na >K in all the soils, (Table 2). The exchangeable bases are low. This may be due to the nature of the parent material in the location, intense leaching, weathering etc and hence, low inherent fertility status with regards to the major and micro nutrients. This agreed with the findings. In ferrolysis, excessive Fe3+ in the soil solution displaces exchangeable cations from the exchange complex into the soil solution and these are eventually replaced mainly by Al from clay lattices after oxidation.

Cation exchange capacity: Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) was low for all the pedons ranging from 2.04 to 3.68cmol/ kg. These are in line with the values reported for most Nigerian soils.

With percentage base saturation varied from 28.57 to 37.14% in all the profiles of the studied soils. The CEC of soils influence soil structure stability, nutrient availability, soil pH and other ameliorants. Soils with low CEC are more likely to develop deficiencies in K, Mg and other cations.

Micronutrients: The soil possesses appreciable amount of Mn2+, Zn2+, Cu2+ and Fe3+, with Fe3+ as the highest value in the soil. The release of large amount of Fe3+ and Mn2+ into the soil solution during soil submergence is also known to displace the exchangeable cations from the soil exchange complex. The soils are poorly drained, which is a characteristic of wetland soils

Table 2. Chemical properties result of the studied area.


Sample
 Id
Profile
1 Depth
(cm)
pH In kcl P
Mg/kg
TN
%
TOC
%
OM
%
Ca
Cmol/kg
Mg
Cmol
/kg
Na
Cmol/
Kg
K
Cmol/
kg
Ex
Aci
(H&A)
CEC
Meq/100g
BS
%
Mn
Mg/kg
Zn
Mg/kg
Cu
Mg/kg
Fe
Mg/kg
B1OSI 0-16 5.2 1.12 0.1288 6.72 11.56 0.56 0.16 0.18 0.07 1.6 2.57 37.74 74.589 209.272 52.374 1,686.142
B1OSI 16-54 4.8 0.036 0.56 6.78 11.66 0.02 0.37 0.08 0.03 1.4 1.9 26.32 296.712 94.692 69.834 1,598.848
B1OSI 54-74 5.2 2.56 0.0672 8.68 14.93 0.18 0.19 0.20 0.14 1 1.71 41.52 310.569 78.374 74.484 1,552.706
B1OSI 74-164 5.0 2.28 0.0504 5.88 10.11 Nil 0.22 0.10 0.04 1.6 1.96 18.37 352.323 56.952 86.052 1,641.182
Mean   5.1 1.499 0.20 7.02 12.07 0.19 0.24 0.14 0.07 1.4 2.04 31.04 258.55 109.82 70.69 1,619.72
                                   
B2PR 0-15 4.6 1.91 0.084 6.3 10.84 0.48 0.28 0.08 0.06 1.4 2.3 39.13 352.468 55.876 56.932 1,692.588
B2PR 15-28 4.7 3 .25 0.0952 6.6 11.35 0.10 0.76 0.15 0.07 1 2.08 51.92 489.692 264.162 96.578 1,996.744
B2PR 28-50 4.7 3.51 0.0616 7.02 12.07 0.0038 0.38 0.19 0.06 9 9.63 6.58 510.408 42.948 70.444 1,658.044
B2PR 50-70 4.9 3.58 0.0392 7.74 13.31 0.16 0.18 0.16 0.06 1.8 2.36 23.73 434.268 229.883 26.048 1,697.892
B2PR 70-136 5.0 3.11 0.0616 7.68 13.21 0.08 0.19 0.11 0.05 1.6 2.03 21.48 912.296 82.204 151.484 1,737.144
Mean 4.8 3.07 0.068 7.07 12.16 0.16 0.36 0.14 0.06 3.0 3.68 28.57 539.83 135.01 80.30 1,756.48
B3OKS 0-20 4.5 5.21 0.1288 6.06 10.42 0.0015 0.05 0.12 0.07 3 3.24 7.45 229.846 62.372 156.932 1,696.587
B3OKS 20-45 5.0 3.25 0.0672 6.72 11.56 Nil 0.25 0.19 0.07 1.2 1.71 29.82 198.616 50.164 176.880 1,659.921
B3OKS 45-60 4.8 2.89 0.056 6.9 11.89 0.004 0.79 0.15 0.05 1.4 2.39 41.59 219.552 78.528 60.308 1,715.143
B3OKS 60-176 5.1 2.35 0.0616 8.8 15.14 0.36 0.78 0.55 0.15 0.8 2.64 69.70 705.372 239.232 46.396 1,737.072
Mean 4.9 3.43 0.078 7.12 12.25 0.09 0.47 0.25 0.09 1.6 2.50 37.14 338.35 107.574 110.13 1702.18
Keys: KCl= potassium chloride, H2O= Water, pH= soil reaction, TOC= total organic carbon, OM= organic matter, Ca= calcium,Mg= magnesium,Na= sodium, K= potassium, Ex Aci= exchangeable acidity (H&AL), Zn= zinc, Mn= manganese, Cu= copper, Fe= iron, TN= total nitrogen, P= available phosphorus and CEC= cation exchangeable capacity.

LAND EVALUATION

Land capability classification

It was observed that the soil profile B1OSI, B2PR, and B3OKS are moderately capable with limitations such as low fertility. The low soil fertility and possibility of periodic high-water (Table 3) (wetness).

Table 3. Land capability classification of the soils of the study area.

  B1OSI B2PR B3OKS
Slope% 0–4 0-4 0-4
Drainage Poorly drained Moderately drained Moderately drained
Effective soil depth 164cm 136cm 176cm
Soil texture class 0 – 30cm S L– S LS – LS LS – LS
Fertility                        
pH (KCL) 4.5 – 5.2 4.6 – 5.0 4.5 – 5.1
Total N 0.0504– 0.56 0.0392-0.0952 0.056– 0.1288
Total organic carbon (TOC) 5.88 – 8.68 6.3 – 7.74 4.5– 8.8
Available P 0.036 – 2.56 0.111 – 3.58 2.35– 5.21
Exc K 0.04 – 0.14 0.05– 0.09 0.04 – 0.15
Exc Ac 1– 1.6 1- 9 0.8 – 3
CEC 1.71 – 3.25 2– 9.63 1.71 – 3.24
B.s 18.37 – 50.77 6.58 – 51.92 7.45 – 69.70
Mn 69.852 – 463.564 352.468 – 912.296 198.616– 705.372
Cu 45.508 – 86.052 26.048-151.484 46.396 – 176.880
Iron 1552.706 – 1686.142 1586.746-1996.744 1659.921 – 1737.072
Zinc 56.952-228.008 42.948 – 315.208 50.164– 239.232
Capability class
Capability unit
Moderately capable
IIfw
Moderately capable
IIf
Moderately capable
IIf
Key
II - Capability class II (Moderately capable)
F - Fertility deficiency
w - Wetness/drainage

Land suitability evaluation (LSE)

It was observed that B1OSI, B2PR and B3OKS are marginally suitable for cassava production with limitation such as soil physical constraints, as well as low fertility and drainage/ high level of wetness, low fertility in B1OSI. This was similar to the result obtained in a study on alfisols and ultisols in Ogun State which showed that all the pedons were marginally suitable (S3), the major limitations are soil texture and structure, which directly affect water-holding capacity, permeability of the soil and other physical properties (Table 4). Other limiting factors were drainage and soil fertility, measured by CEC, organic matter and total nitrogen content. However, good soil management practices that encourage the use of organic manure, cultivation of cover crops, zero tillage as well as correct usage of the land for the use it is meant for are required for sustainable production. Soil profile B2PR is moderately suitable with limitations of low fertility while B1OSI and B3OKS are marginally suitable with limitations such as low fertility and drainage/high level of wetness for oil palm.

Table 4. Land Suitability Evaluation of the soils for some selected crop.


Crop/Sample Id
B1OSI B2PR B3OKS
Cassava S3wf S3f S3f
Maize S3wf S2f S3f
Oil Palm S3wf S2f S2f
S1 – Highly suitable              S2 – Moderately suitable S3 – Marginally suitable N2- Permanently not suitable
Limitations: s - Soil physical constraints (e.g. ironstone pan, high infiltration rate, etc); E - Susceptibility to erosion; c – Climate; f - Low fertility; w - Drainage/high level of wetness.

Fertility capability classification

Based on fertility capability classification, of the different condition modifiers used in the evaluation (Table 5), potassium deficiency (k- <0.20cmol/100g) and low cation exchange capacity (e- <15cmol/kg) occurred in the soils studied. The soil profiles were thus classified as Skleg, SLkeg and SSkeg for the soil profiles (B1OSI, B2PR and B3OKS respectively). Potassium deficiency occurred in all soils because majority of the soils are very high in sand content, the sandy texture of the soils as well as high concentration of the gravels in the soil must have encouraged the leaching of the available soil nutrients as K+ which are highly soluble.

Table 5. Fertility capability classification (fcc) of the soils of the study area.


Description
B1OSI B2PR B3OKS
Texture      
Type
0-20cm
S S S
Substrata type
0-50cm
S L S
k exchangeable K is < 0.20 cmol/kg K K K
e soils with low CEC in the plow layer E E E
FCC SSkeg SLkeg SSkeg
S-Sandy top soil; loamy sands and sand Sub-strata type; L-Loamy subsoil; S- Sandy subsoil Condition Modifiers
k- Soils having very low amounts of potassium (exchangeable K less than 0.2cmol/100g soil); e- Soils with low CEC in the plow layer; g- prolonged waterlogging(soil saturated with wetness for over long period)

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

The study soils are moderately to poorly drained soil and predominant on sandy loam and loamy sand. The soil reaction varied from very strongly acid to strongly acid, low in total nitrogen, available phosphorous and moderate in organic carbon, organic matter but high in iron, manganese, copper and zinc. It was observed that for land capability classification the soils were moderately capable with capability unit IIfw and IIf with limitations of fertility and wetness. For suitability classification the soils were moderately (S2) and marginally (S3) suitable for cassava, maize and oil palm and for fertility capability classification, the soils were classified as SSKeg, SLkeg and SSkeg showing low condition modifiers. The Identified major limitation on these soils for wetland cassava,maize and oil palm production is mostly fertility problem, the soil fertility problem can be amended using appropriate fertilizers to move these soils to moderately suitable (S2) for the crop production. The K, pH and CEC are the most relevant soil properties needed to contribute to the yield of these crop production in the study area and can be useful in soil fertility evaluation studies when determining optimum levels of nutrients for wetland production thereby concentrating more on the most relevant soil properties required in order to save cost on fertilizer use.

References

  1. Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comín FA, Yockteng R (2012). Structural and Functional Loss in Restored Wetland Ecosystems. Plos Biol. 10: 1001247.
  2. Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

  3. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000). The value of wetlands: importance of scale and landscape setting. Ecol. Econ. 35: 25-33.
  4. Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

  5. Fasina AS, Adeyanju A (2007). Comparison of three Land Evaluation Systems in Evaluating the Predictive Value of some selected soils in Ado-Ekiti, Southwest Nigeria. J Soil Sci. 17:113-119.
  6. Google Scholar

  7. Klute,A (1986). Laboratory measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1 Physical and Mineralogical Properties, Including Statistics of Measurement and Sampling 9: 210-221.
  8. Google Scholar , Crossref

  9. Bray RH, Kurtz LT (1945). Determination of total organic carbon and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59: 39-45.
  10. Google Scholar

  11. Sanchez PA, Palm CA, Buol SW (2003). Fertility Capability soil classification: a tool to help assess soil quality in the tropics. Geoderma.114: 157-185.
  12. Indexed at, Google Scholar , Crossref

  13. Smyth AJ, Montgomery RF (1962). Soils and Land Use in Central Western Nigeria. Soils and Land Use in Central Western Nigeria. 264.
  14. Google Scholar

  15. Akamigbo FOR (2000). Nigerian Agriculture and the Challenges of the 21st century: Nigerian Soils. University of Nigeria, Nsukka Nigeria. 62-67.
  16. Crossref

  17. Akamigbo FOR (1984). The accuracy of field textures in humid tropical environment. Soil Survey and Land Evaluation. 493: 63-70.
  18. Google Scholar

  19. Kamalu OJ, Udom BE, Omenihu AA (2017). Assessment of Soil Quality in Represeentative Pedons of the Sombreiro Warri Deltaic Plain of the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Int J Agric Earth Sci. 3.
  20. Google Scholar