Journal of Research in International Business and Management

Immigration Challenges: Legal Perspectives on Global Migration

Anne Wang^* Department of Business Administration, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
^*Corresponding Author:
Anne Wang, Department of Business Administration, Eindhoven University of Technology, Netherlands, Email: wanga.@tue.nl

Received: 29-Nov-2023, Manuscript No. 121965; Editor assigned: 04-Dec-2023, Pre QC No. 121965; Reviewed: 16-Dec-2023, QC No. 121965; Revised: 21-Dec-2023, Manuscript No. 121965; Published: 29-Dec-2023, DOI: 10.14303//jribm.2023.054

Introduction

The issue of global migration has become an increasingly complex and contentious topic, with legal perspectives playing a crucial role in shaping policies and addressing challenges (Abdullahi, et al. 2022). As the world becomes more interconnected, individuals seek opportunities, refuge, and a better life in different countries, leading to a myriad of legal considerations (Agaronnik, et al. 2019).

Global migration is governed by a complex web of international laws, treaties, and agreements. Organizations like the United Nations and the International Organization for Migration play pivotal roles in setting guidelines and standards (Amann, et al. 2020). Legal frameworks such as the Refugee Convention of 1951 provide the foundation for protecting individuals fleeing persecution, while other agreements address issues like human trafficking and migrant workers' rights (Belbase, et al. 2020).

Each country establishes its immigration policies based on its unique economic, social, and political context. Striking a balance between protecting national interests and respecting human rights is a delicate task (Benjamin, 2020). Legal experts grapple with questions of border control, visa regulations, and the treatment of undocumented migrants, navigating the tension between sovereignty and global responsibility (Cardan, et al. 2021).

One of the most pressing immigration challenges involves the legal status of asylum seekers and refugees. Legal systems worldwide face the task of defining criteria for granting asylum, ensuring fair and efficient asylum procedures, and addressing the growing numbers of displaced individuals (Kiskis, 2023). Humanitarian concerns intersect with legal frameworks as nations grapple with providing protection while managing potential strain on resources.

Immigration enforcement often involves detention and deportation processes that raise ethical and legal questions (Wagh & Anand, 2020). Legal experts scrutinize the conditions in detention centres, the rights of detainees, and the justifiability of deportations. Balancing national security concerns with human rights considerations is an on-going challenge that requires nuanced legal perspectives.

Beyond entry and legal status, successful immigration policies must also consider the integration of migrants into their host societies (Wishnia & Goudge 2020). Legal frameworks that promote cultural diversity, nondiscrimination, and social cohesion are essential in fostering inclusive societies and mitigating tensions arising from immigration (Zeng, 2022).

Conclusion

Navigating the legal landscape of global migration requires a delicate balance between upholding national interests and safeguarding human rights. As immigration challenges continue to evolve, legal perspectives play a vital role in shaping policies that are both effective and humane. By fostering international cooperation and employing thoughtful legal solutions, the global community can work towards addressing the complexities of immigration and ensuring a more just and compassionate future for migrants worldwide.

References

Abdullahi A, Roberts TD, Daniel CP, Aucoin AJ, Ingram EE, et al (2022). Financial management and perioperative leadership in the ambulatory setting journal title: Best practice in clinical research. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 36: 311-322.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Agaronnik N, Campbell E.G, Ressalam J, & Iezzoni L.I (2019). Communicating with patients with disability: Perspectives of practicing physicians. Journal of general internal medicine. 34: 1139-1145.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Amann J, Blasimme A, Vayena E, Frey D, Madai V.I, & Precise4Q Consortium (2020). Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 20: 1-9.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Belbase A, Sanzenbacher GT, & Walters AN (2020). Dementia, help with financial management, and financial well-being. J Aging Soc Policy. 32: 242-259.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Benjamin G.C (2020). Perspectives from the field: using legal epidemiology to advance public health practice. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 26: S93-S95.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Cardan RA, Covington EL, & Popple RA (2021). Code Wisely: Risk assessment and mitigation for custom clinical software. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 22: 273-279.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Kiskis M (2023). Legal framework for the coexistence of humans and conscious AI. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. 6.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Wagh R.S, & Anand D (2020). Legal document similarity: a multi-criteria decision-making perspective. PeerJ Computer Science. 6: e262.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Wishnia J, & Goudge J (2020). Impact of financial management centralisation in a health system under austerity: a qualitative study from South Africa. BMJ Glob Health. 5: e003524.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Zeng, Y. (2022). Neural Network Technology-Based Optimization Framework of Financial and Management Accounting Model. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022.

Indexed at, Google scholar, Cross Ref

Citation: Wang (2023). Immigration Challenges: Legal Perspectives on Global Migration. JRIBM. 10: 054.