GET THE APP

International Research Journals
Reach Us +44-7897-074717

Journal of Research in International Business and Management

All submissions of the EM system will be redirected to Online Manuscript Submission System. Authors are requested to submit articles directly to Online Manuscript Submission System of respective journal.

Mini Review - Journal of Research in International Business and Management ( 2024) Volume 11, Issue 1

Economic Growth vs. Economic Development: Defining Success

Bahmani Sirous*
 
Department of Economics, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea
 
*Corresponding Author:
Bahmani Sirous, Department of Economics, Dongguk University, Korea, Email: Bahmanisir415@gmail.com

Received: 03-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. 126544; Editor assigned: 07-Feb-2024, Pre QC No. 126544; Reviewed: 20-Feb-2024, QC No. 126544; Revised: 24-Feb-2024, Manuscript No. 126544; Published: 28-Feb-2024, DOI: 10.14303//jribm.2024.010

Introduction

In the realm of economics, the terms "economic growth" and "economic development" are often used interchangeably, yet they represent distinct concepts with unique implications for societies. While economic growth focuses on the quantitative increase in a nation's output of goods and services, economic development encompasses a broader array of factors, including improvements in living standards, social welfare, and distribution of wealth (Abdulsalam et al., 2020). Understanding the differences between these two concepts is crucial for policymakers and economists alike as they strive to define and measure success in modern economies.

Economic growth is primarily concerned with the expansion of a country's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over time. It is measured by the percentage increase in the value of goods and services produced within a nation's borders (Devine et al., 2021). This growth is often viewed as a fundamental indicator of economic health and vitality, reflecting increased productivity, investment, and technological advancement. GDP growth rates, however, do not provide a complete picture of an economy's well-being (Hughes, et al. 2023). They can mask disparities in income distribution, environmental degradation, and the quality of life experienced by citizens. Moreover, a focus solely on GDP growth may lead to policies that prioritize short-term gains at the expense of long-term sustainability and social equity (Liu & Li, 2022).

Economic development, on the other hand, encompasses a broader set of objectives beyond mere economic output. It encompasses improvements in human capital, infrastructure, healthcare, education, and environmental sustainability (Miernicki, et al. 2019). Economic development seeks to enhance the overall well-being and quality of life for all members of society, with a focus on reducing poverty, inequality, and social exclusion (Miernicki, et al. 2019).

Unlike economic growth, which can be measured quantitatively, economic development is a multifaceted and qualitative concept. It considers factors such as access to healthcare, education, housing, and cultural opportunities, as well as the preservation of natural resources and the promotion of social cohesion (Patel et al., 2020).

While economic growth and economic development are distinct concepts, they are not mutually exclusive. In fact, sustainable economic development often requires robust economic growth as a foundation for progress. However, it is essential to recognize that economic growth alone does not guarantee broad-based improvements in living standards or social welfare (Schwatka et al., 2021).

Policymakers face the challenge of promoting economic growth while simultaneously fostering economic development that is inclusive, equitable, and environmentally sustainable. This requires a holistic approach to policymaking that considers the social, environmental, and ethical implications of economic decisions (Weiss et al., 2009).

As societies evolve, the traditional metrics of economic success, such as GDP growth, become increasingly inadequate for capturing the complexities of human well- being and progress. Alternative measures, such as the Human Development Index (HDI), the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), offer more comprehensive frameworks for assessing economic development and societal progress. These measures take into account factors such as life expectancy, education attainment, income distribution, environmental quality, and social inclusion, providing a more nuanced understanding of a nation's development trajectory (Yin, et al. 2022).

Conclusion

In the pursuit of prosperity and progress, it is essential to recognize that economic growth and economic development are not synonymous terms. While economic growth focuses on the quantitative expansion of economic output, economic development encompasses a broader set of objectives aimed at improving the overall well-being and quality of life for all members of society. Defining success in modern economies requires a balanced approach that integrates economic growth with considerations of social equity, environmental sustainability, and human development. By embracing a holistic understanding of economic progress, policymakers can work towards building more resilient, inclusive, and sustainable societies for future generations.

References

Abdulsalam D, Maltarich MA, Nyberg AJ, Reilly G, Martin M (2020). Individualized pay-for-performance arrangements: Peer reactions and consequences. J Applied Psychol. 106:1202-1223.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Devine A, Shields M, Dimov S, Dickinson H, Vaughan C et al (2021). Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work. Int J Environ Res. 18: 11485.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Hughes A, Auliya M, Altherr S, Scheffers B, Janssen J, Nijman V & Edwards D.P (2023). Determining the sustainability of legal wildlife trade. Journal of Environmental Management. 341: 117987.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Liu X, & Li S (2022). The impact of criminal law regulation-based business environment optimization on entrepreneurial spirit and enterprise development. Frontiers in Psychology. 13: 944146.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Miernicki M, Hofmann T, Eisenberger I, Von der Kammer F, & Praetorius A (2019). Legal and practical challenges in classifying nanomaterials according to regulatory definitions. Nature nanotechnology. 14: 208-216.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Moores B.M (2021). On the justification of justification in radiation protection-legal and sociological considerations. Radiography. 27: 704-708.

Google Scholar

Patel PC, Reid SW, Wolfe MT (2020). Self-employment, depression, and older individuals: A cross-country study. J Affect Disord. 265: 175-184.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Schwatka NV, Dally M, Shore E, Dexter L, Tenney L et al (2021). Profiles of total worker health in United States small businesses. BMC Public Health. 21: 1-1.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Weiss MD, Tyink S, Kubiak C (2009). Delivering ideal employee experiences. Aaohn Journal. 57: 210-215.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Yin J.H, Song H.Y, & Zeng K.X (2022). Does a smart business environment promote corporate investment? a case study of Hangzhou. Plos one. 17: e0269089.

Indexed at, Google Scholar, Cross Ref

Citation: Sirous B (2024). Economic Growth vs. Economic Development: Defining Success. JRIBM. 11: 010.